Ye Olde Green Wave Forum

The DEFINITIVE Tulane discussion forum
It is currently Tue Nov 20, 2018 8:25 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 2:34 pm 
Online
Coach Level
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 9:03 am
Posts: 1905
Location: Garyville, Louisiana
The one thing I've noticed since head coach WF has been here is that we rarely get "blown out" like in years past. My definition of a "blow out" is 2 scores or more (14 or more points). While we all would like to win more and go bowling - we've come so close the last 2 years (2017 - Navy, FIU, USF, Cincy, SMU; 2018 - WF, UAB, SMU). That got me wondering - how many times have we been blown out since WF was hired as compared to the years before that (I went back to 2010). Question: Are we moving in the right direction?

What I found was somewhat surprising but then again, not all THAT surprising but I'll share it here with you now.

Tulane has lost by 14 or more 6 times since WF was hired in 2016.

2018 - 1

Ohio State

2017 - 2

Oklahoma
Memphis

2016 - 3

Tulsa
UCF
Temple

For comparison, Tulane lost by 14 or more 6 times in BOTH 2015 and 2014. Since 2010 the only year with less that 6 blowout losses before WF was hired was in 2013 (2 times) when we went bowling. Here are the totals before WF was hired. Its amazing how may times in a season we had to watch such lopsided blowouts.

2015 - 6

Duke
Georgia Tech
Temple
Houston
Navy
SMU

2014 - 6

Georgia Tech
Duke
Rutgers
Cincinnati
Memphis
ECU

2013 - 2

Syracuse
FAU

2012 - 6

Tulsa
Ole Miss
UL Monroe
UL Lafayette
Memphis
Houston

2011 - 9

Tulsa
Duke
Army
UTEP
Memphis
ECU
SMU
Houston
Hawaii

2010 - 8

Ole Miss
Houston
Army
Tulsa
SMU
Southern Miss
UCF
Marshall

So, what are your thoughts? Comments? Do you think we are moving in the right direction?

_________________
My name is T. J. Acosta and I approve this message!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 2:41 pm 
Offline
Emerald Circle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 20579
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Good Lord... 2010... And SC/RD brought him back for another year. Gracious. :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 2:51 pm 
Online
Coach Level
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 9:03 am
Posts: 1905
Location: Garyville, Louisiana
PeteRasche wrote:
Good Lord... 2010... And SC/RD brought him back for another year. Gracious. :oops:


I was thinking the same thing about 2010. I wrote down all the scores of the games for each year but it was too depressing to type. Some of the greatest hits were a 53 point loss to UL Monroe, a 28 point loss to UL Lafayette, a 39 point loss to Amry and a 37 point loss to UTEP :shock:

_________________
My name is T. J. Acosta and I approve this message!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 3:05 pm 
Offline
Trainer

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2018 1:49 pm
Posts: 35
Wow. As a new fan I knew Tulane didn't have the greatest football history, but some of those years are just astoundingly bad. There's no comparison to the current situation.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 3:18 pm 
Offline
Emerald Circle
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 8:53 am
Posts: 20125
Location: New Orleans
I know we get upset at what we've perceived as slow progress under Fritz but boy those numbers tell you just what a colossal train wreck this Program was when he got here. Just extremely depressing numbers to consider. And it tells you the train wreck went deep, athletic dpt. support, facilities, budget, recruiting, coaching, etc

_________________
After a while, the residents of the sea do not hear the sound of the waves.
How bitter it is, the story of routine- Arabic (Anon)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 3:30 pm 
Offline
Breaker Level

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 12:17 pm
Posts: 257
Location: River Ridge
I think it has been clear from the start of the Fritz era that things have improved. People want to say "no moral victories;" but, when you have as few victories as we have historically, it's a good start.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 3:32 pm 
Offline
Navigator Level
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 3:50 pm
Posts: 1255
Location: Seattle U.S.A.
Thanks for doing the work to come up with the analysis.

My hope for Tulane football is that we play "competent, legitimate D-I football." I think your analysis shows that WF has definitely delivered that. Especially on defense. It hasn't translated yet into an adequate number of wins, though. I feel confident that Tulane football can slug it out with any team in the country outside of perhaps the top 15.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 4:57 pm 
Offline
Coach Level

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2319
Location: Dothan, AL
While all of us diehards see the obvious improvement the only thing the outside sees are W’s and L’s.
That is why getting to a bowl game this year is so very important. It gives the program some validation. We are a “bowl team”. If we finish 6-6 this year and go bowling does that mean we are dramatically better than the 5-7 team that did not go bowling last year? Who knows but the perception will be that we are much better simply because we made the post season.

_________________
Roll Wave Roll!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 5:31 pm 
Offline
Emerald Circle

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 12:18 am
Posts: 18127
Location: Beautiful Dutchtown
I have no real complaints with what Fritz is doing...it's slow and steady. That's fine.

But comparing most other 21st century Tulane teams, esp Toledo, is a mighty low bar.

_________________
A refreshing culture of standards, expectations and accountability is upon us.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 7:11 pm 
Offline
Emerald Circle
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2004 5:20 pm
Posts: 21039
Location: North Kenner
I have been thinking about this same thing a lot and any reasonable person can see we are a much better program than before Fritz got here. Those same reasonable people knew this wasn’t an overnight quick fix. I feel pretty confident in saying most of those teams prior to Fritz wouldn’t have us in the position we’re in now.

To add to that. Look at the teams we’re were losing big (I consider 3TDs a blowout) and those are conference teams that we now beat and occasionally blow out.

_________________
Tulane Greenbackers

"It's my job to prepare the coaches. It's their job is to prepare the players and the players' job is to play lights out." Willie Fritz

"If you want to win you have to have good players." Vince Gibson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:52 am 
Offline
Navigator Level

Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 7:46 pm
Posts: 1225
What was the year when we were loosing 35-0 one play into the 2nd quarter against UCF?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 11:03 am 
Offline
President's Circle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 11:49 pm
Posts: 2820
Location: Greeneville, TN
I like the analysis and agree that WF has made us more competitive. I hope this means we are on the right track. BTW, we lost to Cincinnati this year by 16, so it belongs on the list for this season as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 4:46 pm 
Offline
Cornerstone
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 7:30 pm
Posts: 30864
Location: 30°37'40.6"N 81°27'02.4"W
I once asked a VATech-fan friend why they bore with Beamer for so many years before they began to win. His answer was "because every year we had more and more CLOSE losses, and we were confident that at some point those would start being victories."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 5:24 pm 
Online
Coach Level
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 9:03 am
Posts: 1905
Location: Garyville, Louisiana
Wavery wrote:
What was the year when we were loosing 35-0 one play into the 2nd quarter against UCF?


In 2010 we lost to UCF 61-14. UCF scored 31 points in the first quarter. :shock:

_________________
My name is T. J. Acosta and I approve this message!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 5:46 pm 
Offline
Emerald Circle
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 11:36 am
Posts: 18482
Location: Philadelphia, PA & Berlin, MD
LSU Law Greenie wrote:
Wavery wrote:
What was the year when we were loosing 35-0 one play into the 2nd quarter against UCF?


In 2010 we lost to UCF 61-14. UCF scored 31 points in the first quarter. :shock:

When you are that far outclassed you can smell it on the field. I officiated a varsity HS game this season where it was 34-0 at the end of 1Q—unforced PAT miss. Ended up 61-0 with 2nd team in entire 2nd half.

_________________
Tulane Class of 1978 | NROTC Tulane - Submariner | Slow learner


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 6:24 pm 
Offline
Navigator Level

Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2017 1:22 pm
Posts: 871
Roller wrote:
I once asked a VATech-fan friend why they bore with Beamer for so many years before they began to win. His answer was "because every year we had more and more CLOSE losses, and we were confident that at some point those would start being victories."


The facts of why Beamer got the chance he got is that he took over a program that got hit with severe sanctions caused by the previous staff. Then there's the fact that he had winning seasons in years 3 and 4. He then had two more losing seasons one of which was 5-6. Then the consecutive winning seasons began. So it was not a situation where he did not win for six straight seasons.

_________________
Sadly it's over


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 6:47 pm 
Offline
President's Circle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 8:02 pm
Posts: 2644
Location: Fullerton, CA
I don't think there is a lot of disagreement about there having been significant progress in the program, in terms of somewhat improved recruiting, shoring up the defense, and better weight training and conditioning. The open question--to which we hoped we might get a resounding affirmative answer this year--is whether these improvements are leading to winning seasons, bowl appearances, conference championships, etc.

Measured by performance game to game, this team has been all over the place. That is the single most powerful reason why the losses trigger so much dissatisfaction and the fear that things might have ceased to move in the right direction. We still don't have an answer to the big question.


Last edited by Wandering Quaker on Thu Nov 08, 2018 8:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 7:28 pm 
Offline
Emerald Circle
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 4:00 pm
Posts: 14383
wavedom wrote:
Roller wrote:
I once asked a VATech-fan friend why they bore with Beamer for so many years before they began to win. His answer was "because every year we had more and more CLOSE losses, and we were confident that at some point those would start being victories."


The facts of why Beamer got the chance he got is that he took over a program that got hit with severe sanctions caused by the previous staff. Then there's the fact that he had winning seasons in years 3 and 4. He then had two more losing seasons one of which was 5-6. Then the consecutive winning seasons began. So it was not a situation where he did not win for six straight seasons.


The season after that 5-6 one was 2-8-1. Hard to imagine the patience that must have taken when it looked like they were headed the wrong way again.

_________________
Seize the day


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 7:32 pm 
Offline
Navigator Level

Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2017 1:22 pm
Posts: 871
OGSB wrote:
wavedom wrote:
Roller wrote:
I once asked a VATech-fan friend why they bore with Beamer for so many years before they began to win. His answer was "because every year we had more and more CLOSE losses, and we were confident that at some point those would start being victories."


The facts of why Beamer got the chance he got is that he took over a program that got hit with severe sanctions caused by the previous staff. Then there's the fact that he had winning seasons in years 3 and 4. He then had two more losing seasons one of which was 5-6. Then the consecutive winning seasons began. So it was not a situation where he did not win for six straight seasons.


The season after that 5-6 one was 2-8-1. Hard to imagine the patience that must have taken when it looked like they were headed the wrong way again.


As noted above the program was hit with huge recruiting sanctions because of the previous regime. There were winning seasons in years 3 and 4. And they had a man with a backbone that understood the situation Beamer walked into.

_________________
Sadly it's over


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 7:38 pm 
Offline
Emerald Circle
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 4:00 pm
Posts: 14383
wavedom wrote:
OGSB wrote:
wavedom wrote:
Roller wrote:
I once asked a VATech-fan friend why they bore with Beamer for so many years before they began to win. His answer was "because every year we had more and more CLOSE losses, and we were confident that at some point those would start being victories."


The facts of why Beamer got the chance he got is that he took over a program that got hit with severe sanctions caused by the previous staff. Then there's the fact that he had winning seasons in years 3 and 4. He then had two more losing seasons one of which was 5-6. Then the consecutive winning seasons began. So it was not a situation where he did not win for six straight seasons.


The season after that 5-6 one was 2-8-1. Hard to imagine the patience that must have taken when it looked like they were headed the wrong way again.


As noted above the program was hit with huge recruiting sanctions because of the previous regime. There were winning seasons in years 3 and 4. And they had a man with a backbone that understood the situation Beamer walked into.


Obviously I’m not arguing the decision was wrong I’m just trying to look at it as someone who doesn’t know what’s going to happen, like everyone else up to this moment.

_________________
Seize the day


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 7:54 pm 
Offline
Emerald Circle
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 4:00 pm
Posts: 14383
Interesting to look at Buddy Teevens. Won 10 games here in 5 seasons. Flopped at Stanford afterwards. Went back to Dartmouth and won 9 games in his first 5 seasons back. That’s one less than 5 seasons here. Since then he’s gone 59-29. Maybe we weren’t patient enough?

_________________
Seize the day


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 8:06 pm 
Offline
President's Circle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 8:02 pm
Posts: 2644
Location: Fullerton, CA
OGSB wrote:
Interesting to look at Buddy Teevens. Won 10 games here in 5 seasons. Flopped at Stanford afterwards. Went back to Dartmouth and won 9 games in his first 5 seasons back. That’s one less than 5 seasons here. Since then he’s gone 59-29. Maybe we weren’t patient enough?


No, we did the right thing. He had enough chance everywhere to change his approach. He never did, which is one reason the offense stank while he was running the show at Tulane.

Hanover is a coaching dead end. Dartmouth was lucky to get someone who wanted to be there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 2:59 am 
Offline
Breaker Level
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:45 pm
Posts: 370
Location: Slidell
At least teams have to get up to play Tulane these days. The Memphis's and USF's of the world used to be able to just show up and win by 30, not to mention getting skulldrugged by bad programs (ULM, ULL, Rice, etc.) with even fewer resources than us. Things have gotten so much better since then. I know that "not getting blown out all the time" is a low bar and there are higher expectations now, but it actually is progress. All I can ask is that Tulane continues to improve.

_________________
"You are unique, just like everyone else"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 10:36 am 
Offline
Navigator Level

Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:48 am
Posts: 1041
Location: Lost
GEez. I found a way to forget about those losses to ULM and ULL. Looking back, that was the worst offensive line I have ever seen play. We had Darkwa and Kelly and could not run the ball. Also had DJ Ponder as out qb. What a mess! I do not know all of the Tulane seasons, but getting the doors blown off by both ULM and ULL in a season.....that has to be ranked as one of the worst! lol


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 12:28 pm 
Offline
President's Circle
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 5:13 pm
Posts: 3212
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
TXWave88 wrote:
GEez. I found a way to forget about those losses to ULM and ULL. Looking back, that was the worst offensive line I have ever seen play. We had Darkwa and Kelly and could not run the ball. Also had DJ Ponder as out qb. What a mess! I do not know all of the Tulane seasons, but getting the doors blown off by both ULM and ULL in a season.....that has to be ranked as one of the worst! lol

It was so bad that Big$ hasn't been back since

_________________
Tulane BSCE & Army ROTC class of 2004


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], LSU Law Greenie and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group