Tulane Wake Forest
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
If he runs the ball there, he either picks up first down or gets in FG range.
- PeteRasche
- Cornerstone
- Posts: 30922
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:52 am
- Location: Cincinnati, OH
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
This is stunning. I expected 4 slants and a touchdown. It's like they didn't even try.
- Roller
- Cornerstone
- Posts: 36994
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 7:30 pm
- Location: 9½° due east of The Tulane University of Louisiana
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
He kicked it a million yards and right thru the posts, just a few minutes ago! WHY oh WHY not trust him when you're not going to get another possession?
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
Untimed down on the turnover?
Using big words is not a personal attack
#cousins don't count
#cousins don't count
- Roller
- Cornerstone
- Posts: 36994
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 7:30 pm
- Location: 9½° due east of The Tulane University of Louisiana
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
Every single piece of evidence (a single data point, but...) says we do, if we'll only have faith.TUPF wrote:Oh for a kicker.
Ya gotta BELIEVE!
-
- Navigator Level
- Posts: 1471
- Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:47 am
- Location: San Ramon, California
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
It’s gonna haunt us again. We had the ball on their side of field, needing a field goal to win, first down, one minute to play, two time outs.
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
Both coaches have played not to lose. Painful for whoever loses this one.
- tulaneoutlaw
- Regent's Circle
- Posts: 8867
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:49 pm
- Location: Greeneville, TN
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
Lets win on the first OT please.
- TUPF
- Emerald Circle
- Posts: 21455
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 11:36 am
- Location: Maryland Eastern Shore & sometimes Philly
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
I don’t like how this is setting up. If I’m Wake I slant us to death.
Fan since 1974 living in Phelps seeing the upper bowl of Tulane Stadium
- Roller
- Cornerstone
- Posts: 36994
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 7:30 pm
- Location: 9½° due east of The Tulane University of Louisiana
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
Apparently not.windywave wrote:Untimed down on the turnover?
- PeteRasche
- Cornerstone
- Posts: 30922
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:52 am
- Location: Cincinnati, OH
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
If I told you Banks has a better QB rating than Hartman, would you believe it? He currently does.
- gerryb323
- Regent's Circle
- Posts: 9660
- Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:18 am
- Location: There's no place like home
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
2 INTs will kill that!PeteRasche wrote:If I told you Banks has a better QB rating than Hartman, would you believe it? He currently does.
Wandering around somewhere in a matchup zone
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
The 2 picks. Kid has been fantastic though.PeteRasche wrote:If I told you Banks has a better QB rating than Hartman, would you believe it? He currently does.
Last edited by NJwave on Thu Aug 30, 2018 10:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- PeteRasche
- Cornerstone
- Posts: 30922
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:52 am
- Location: Cincinnati, OH
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
Wake taking defense first.
- tulaneoutlaw
- Regent's Circle
- Posts: 8867
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:49 pm
- Location: Greeneville, TN
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
If you told me we only gave up 17 points to Wake in regulation I'd have said we won relatively easily.
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
You sound like the frick quants that insist the math saya the position is perfectly hedged.PeteRasche wrote:If I told you Banks has a better QB rating than Hartman, would you believe it? He currently does.
Using big words is not a personal attack
#cousins don't count
#cousins don't count
- gerryb323
- Regent's Circle
- Posts: 9660
- Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:18 am
- Location: There's no place like home
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
Ha, the ref called the south end zone the north end zone. Pshaw
Wandering around somewhere in a matchup zone
- PeteRasche
- Cornerstone
- Posts: 30922
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:52 am
- Location: Cincinnati, OH
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
Obviously, but doesn't it just feel like Hartman was outstanding and Banks disappointing?NJwave wrote:The 2 picks.PeteRasche wrote:If I told you Banks has a better QB rating than Hartman, would you believe it? He currently does.
- Private Joker
- Coach Level
- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 3:50 pm
- Location: Bainbridge Island USA
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
Boy you are not kidding. Sean Payton would have played it way, way differently.NJwave wrote:Both coaches have played not to lose. Painful for whoever loses this one.
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
Playing in to the raucous student section.
-
- Navigator Level
- Posts: 1471
- Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:47 am
- Location: San Ramon, California
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
Probably because Hartman has two Ints and Banks hit Encalade for two big scoring plays.PeteRasche wrote:If I told you Banks has a better QB rating than Hartman, would you believe it? He currently does.
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
I couldn't tell you which was whichgerryb323 wrote:Ha, the ref called the south end zone the north end zone. Pshaw
Using big words is not a personal attack
#cousins don't count
#cousins don't count
- PeteRasche
- Cornerstone
- Posts: 30922
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:52 am
- Location: Cincinnati, OH
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
I thought I was going to have to wait for tomorrow to hit my 20,000th post...
Re: Tulane Wake Forest
Yes. Two huge plays but otherwise tough night.PeteRasche wrote:Obviously, but doesn't it just feel like Hartman was outstanding and Banks disappointing?NJwave wrote:The 2 picks.PeteRasche wrote:If I told you Banks has a better QB rating than Hartman, would you believe it? He currently does.