Mooney and Encalade top WR duo in the country
Mooney and Encalade top WR duo in the country
despite Encalade’s absence lately he and Mooney are still the most productive WR duo in the country. Obviously this is a little flawed as a lot of teams spread the ball around to more receivers reducing their averages but it is still nice to be at the top in something, especially offensively.
Tulane Greenbackers
"If you want to win you have to have good players." Vince Gibson
"If you want to win you have to have good players." Vince Gibson
Re: Mooney and Encalade top WR duo in the country
Spread of 82% to 68% from first to second is immense. This just confirms Guerry Smith's reporting. We have two receivers and that's about it.
Re: Mooney and Encalade top WR duo in the country
Didn't realize this was ever in question or that we even needed Guerry to report it. We had one receiver last year until Mooney started coming on towards the end.Baywave1 wrote:Spread of 82% to 68% from first to second is immense. This just confirms Guerry Smith's reporting. We have two receivers and that's about it.
Re: Mooney and Encalade top WR duo in the country
This number is so inflated by a flawed offensive philosophy. Two catches by RB’s the entire year. The TE is never part of the game plan. Wonder why we get sacked so much. I don’t understand what they are trying to accomplish through the air.
Re: Mooney and Encalade top WR duo in the country
i know it’s a waste of time to respond, but you are greatly confusing two things. The lack of awareness by the QB isn’t a “they” question. We know what “they” want to accomplish. They just need a QB that can accomplish it.tjtlja wrote:This number is so inflated by a flawed offensive philosophy. Two catches by RB’s the entire year. The TE is never part of the game plan. Wonder why we get sacked so much. I don’t understand what they are trying to accomplish through the air.
Is a TE that runs a route 90% of our pass plays considered “not part of the game plan”? Or a wide open RB in the flat on most pass plays not part of the game plan? Of course a QB holding on to the ball too long would never create sacks. It’s those planned sacks the coaches use that are killing us.
Tulane Greenbackers
"If you want to win you have to have good players." Vince Gibson
"If you want to win you have to have good players." Vince Gibson
Re: Mooney and Encalade top WR duo in the country
If the QB doesn't check it down to the RB in the flat, that's one thing. But there's no reason we can't run an angle or wheel route where the RB is the primary receiver. Or, heaven forbid, a screen.waverider wrote:i know it’s a waste of time to respond, but you are greatly confusing two things. The lack of awareness by the QB isn’t a “they” question. We know what “they” want to accomplish. They just need a QB that can accomplish it.tjtlja wrote:This number is so inflated by a flawed offensive philosophy. Two catches by RB’s the entire year. The TE is never part of the game plan. Wonder why we get sacked so much. I don’t understand what they are trying to accomplish through the air.
Is a TE that runs a route 90% of our pass plays considered “not part of the game plan”? Or a wide open RB in the flat on most pass plays not part of the game plan? Of course a QB holding on to the ball too long would never create sacks. It’s those planned sacks the coaches use that are killing us.
- WaveProf
- Cornerstone
- Posts: 25887
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:45 pm
- Location: Irish Channel, New Orleans
Re: Mooney and Encalade top WR duo in the country
ml wave wrote:Or, heaven forbid, a screen.
“We will expect success in all endeavors and be prepared to assess and hold ourselves accountable when we aren't successful. Tulane is a top 40 academic institution and it should expect nothing less from its athletic department.” --Troy Dannen 11.5.16
- gerryb323
- Regent's Circle
- Posts: 9661
- Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:18 am
- Location: There's no place like home
Re: Mooney and Encalade top WR duo in the country
A brief search of Doug Ruse's mental database produced only the following for "screen":WaveProf wrote:ml wave wrote:Or, heaven forbid, a screen.
Wandering around somewhere in a matchup zone
Re: Mooney and Encalade top WR duo in the country
We’ve run designed screens and may have even been successful on one, but in most cases, the RB had no chance of catching and running due to either a poor throw or no OL getting out to block. Maybe Banks has had a chance to work on screen passes and we’ll see more of them. He doesn’t do WR screens well and those throws allow for more space to throw.
Tulane Greenbackers
"If you want to win you have to have good players." Vince Gibson
"If you want to win you have to have good players." Vince Gibson
Re: Mooney and Encalade top WR duo in the country
We have not run one screen play, nor do we ever check to the flats. In addition, no crossing routes utilizing the RB in motion. And this group is the most talented group we have. Kamara and Ingram usually catch the balls 10 times a game. We have completed two passes to the RB’s for the entire year. There must be a way to incorporate this into the game plan.
Re: Mooney and Encalade top WR duo in the country
??? Just curious. He was on this story way before the season started. He called it early, often and correctly especially understanding the implications of Canteen's injury. What do you expect from a beat reporter? If he is delineating the obvious why do you waste money subscribing to his web site?ml wave wrote:Didn't realize this was ever in question or that we even needed Guerry to report it. We had one receiver last year until Mooney started coming on towards the end.Baywave1 wrote:Spread of 82% to 68% from first to second is immense. This just confirms Guerry Smith's reporting. We have two receivers and that's about it.
- gerryb323
- Regent's Circle
- Posts: 9661
- Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:18 am
- Location: There's no place like home
Re: Mooney and Encalade top WR duo in the country
Or maybe if it's that obvious, ml should be the reporter!Baywave1 wrote:??? Just curious. He was on this story way before the season started. He called it early, often and correctly especially understanding the implications of Canteen's injury. What do you expect from a beat reporter? If he is delineating the obvious why do you waste money subscribing to his web site?ml wave wrote:Didn't realize this was ever in question or that we even needed Guerry to report it. We had one receiver last year until Mooney started coming on towards the end.Baywave1 wrote:Spread of 82% to 68% from first to second is immense. This just confirms Guerry Smith's reporting. We have two receivers and that's about it.
Wandering around somewhere in a matchup zone
Re: Mooney and Encalade top WR duo in the country
Happy now? Swing pass bitches
Using big words is not a personal attack
#cousins don't count
#cousins don't count
Re: Mooney and Encalade top WR duo in the country
I'm not criticizing him or his reporting.Baywave1 wrote:??? Just curious. He was on this story way before the season started. He called it early, often and correctly especially understanding the implications of Canteen's injury. What do you expect from a beat reporter? If he is delineating the obvious why do you waste money subscribing to his web site?ml wave wrote:Didn't realize this was ever in question or that we even needed Guerry to report it. We had one receiver last year until Mooney started coming on towards the end.Baywave1 wrote:Spread of 82% to 68% from first to second is immense. This just confirms Guerry Smith's reporting. We have two receivers and that's about it.
Re: Mooney and Encalade top WR duo in the country
In my first act as reporter, I'd like to point out that our OL play is subpar. Will standby for Baywave's confirmation.gerryb323 wrote:Or maybe if it's that obvious, ml should be the reporter!Baywave1 wrote:??? Just curious. He was on this story way before the season started. He called it early, often and correctly especially understanding the implications of Canteen's injury. What do you expect from a beat reporter? If he is delineating the obvious why do you waste money subscribing to his web site?ml wave wrote:Didn't realize this was ever in question or that we even needed Guerry to report it. We had one receiver last year until Mooney started coming on towards the end.Baywave1 wrote:Spread of 82% to 68% from first to second is immense. This just confirms Guerry Smith's reporting. We have two receivers and that's about it.